Procurement

Supplier quote comparison

Collect replies from email and files, match items and prepare a comparison with sources and questions. Scope is tested in the pilot.

Status: pilot at a steel-structures contractor in Kazakhstan. Public case after acceptance and with the client's permission.

The work to address

Supplier replies arrive at different times and in different formats. Procurement copies prices into a spreadsheet, matches units and reconstructs terms.

01

Inputs

Item list, approved suppliers, replies and attachments. Define units, currency, delivery, timing and acceptable alternatives.

What the team receives

01

Comparison

Match items and prices to the request and retain terms affecting the choice.

02

Sources

Open the original reply behind each accepted price.

03

Questions

Separate missing items, incompatible units and unclear conditions.

One application: comparing supplier quotes

A useful comparison shows more than a price: where it came from, what is missing and what needs clarification.

Example format · fictional data

Supplier comparison

Item list → replies → comparison → decision

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

ItemSupplier ASupplier BNext step
8 mm sheetKZT 410,000 / tKZT 425,000 / tCheck terms
20B1 beamNo priceUnit missingAsk a person
80 × 80 tubeKZT 380,000 / tKZT 395,000 / tCheck terms
Clarification required

Supplier B omitted the unit for the beam. Request clarification before adding the price to the comparison. A person chooses the supplier and approves commitments.

This is a scenario illustration using fictional data, not output from a BusinessOS run or a customer case study.

Supplier A reply

Fictional reply A: 8 mm sheet — KZT 410,000 per tonne; 80 × 80 tube — KZT 380,000 per tonne. No beam price. Currency: KZT. VAT, delivery and timing need confirmation.

Supplier B reply

Fictional reply B: 8 mm sheet — KZT 425,000 per tonne; 80 × 80 tube — KZT 395,000 per tonne; 20B1 beam — KZT 37,500, unit unspecified. The beam price cannot be compared automatically.

01

Input

An item list, approved suppliers and comparison rules.

02

Output

A comparison table, price sources and a separate list of questions.

03

Human decision

Clarify ambiguous replies, select a quote and approve commitments.

What to verify before launch

01

The human decision

The owner approves external sending, resolves ambiguities, selects the offer and approves commitments.

02

What to verify before launch

Use one completed request cycle. Test your formats, matching, source links, missing items, sending permissions and protection against repeated sends.

03

How to assess results

Manual preparation time, processing time after replies arrive, completeness and corrections. Measure supplier waiting time separately.

04

Connecting departments

Pass the accepted comparison to estimating with selected items, terms and sources. Agree the handoff fields beforehand.

Working with us

You define the work and accept the result. We handle technical setup, support and development of the agreed solution.

01

Set up

Study real examples and exceptions, configure connections and check the result with the process owner.

02

Support

Investigate technical issues and maintain agreed processes within the service contract.

03

Develop

Assess changes, test them and update the system after approval. New tasks have their own scope and cost.

Working with us

Start with your task

In 20 minutes, discuss inputs, the required output and where a person is needed. Then agree what to test and which materials are necessary.

Leave a contact and a short task description. We will agree separately how to share company documents and confidential data. How enquiries are handled

hello@businessos.kz

One process to startDiscuss an NDA before sharing materials